One thousand surveillance cams in SF and counting

|
(81)

If you walk through densely populated commercial corridors on a regular basis, chances are you’re being recorded. Based on information compiled by CommunityCam, a data visualization project plotting the location of security cameras, there are at least 1,100 surveillance devices installed throughout San Francisco – and possibly many more.

Billed as a “community service initiative” designed to make neighborhoods safer, the CommunityCam platform was developed by VideoSurveillance.com, a proprietor of IP-connected CCTV systems that has served customers ranging from California Pacific Medical Center to Harvard University to Lockheed Martin.

The web-based platform reveals the precise locations of visible security cameras throughout the city, incorporating a crowd-sourcing component that allows anyone to plot the location of a camera.

San Francisco neighborhoods with the highest concentration of surveillance cameras include the Financial District, the areas around North Beach and Chinatown, and the Marina, the data shows. The vast majority of the cameras are privately owned, but the map plots all visible security cameras regardless of whether they’re operated by commercial interests or public agencies.

VideoSurveillance.com president Josh Daniels, a Portland resident who previously lived in San Francisco, launched the effort, which he described as an effort to improve public safety.

“The CommunityCam network of cameras gives community residents a way to investigate when an incident occurs,” Daniels said in an interview with the Guardian. Noting that accidents such as cyclist collisions or physical assaults were common in San Francisco streets, he said, "it's just impossible to investigate these kinds of incidents in San Francisco" without the presence of security cameras. He called the project "a way to let people know that video surveillance can be used in very positive ways."

While Daniels is not formally partnering with police, he described law enforcement as  “very interested in the locations of the cameras” and said he’d met with law enforcement groups in San Francisco as well as neighborhood groups, landlords, and building managers. He added that across the board, police agencies are “very strapped from a financial resources standpoint,” so his project can serve as a tool for those agencies without additional cost.

And collaboration with law enforcement could expand further down the road, Daniels said. “In the future there’s potential to expand the program and expand the services to give law enforcement access to privately held cameras,” Daniels said, “but that’s a long way off.” Media representatives from SFPD had not responded to the Guardian’s request for comment by press time.

While the CommunityCam platform introduces a new level of transparency to private security systems installed throughout the city, it also raises a number of questions. While it’s billed as a public safety program designed to illustrate the useful attributes of CCTV, CommunityCam also serves to illustrate the growing surveillance infrastructure in public space, a phenomenon that necessarily raises questions about the erosion of privacy in a hyper-connected world.

The early-stage data-mapping project also presents questions about how this tool could ultimately be developed and utilized, particularly if it's used toward developing a broader or more centralized surveillance infrastructure. If public safety officials or private security entities use the data to identify gaps where public space isn’t being monitored, it could be used to justify the installation of still more cameras.

Earlier this year, the Guardian spotlighted San Francisco’s pilot project testing out “smart” streetlights that would be wired into a centralized IP-connected system, with possible future uses as street surveillance. We’ve also kept an eye on the San Francisco Police Department’s efforts to collect surveillance footage from local bars.

Privacy and civil liberties advocates have flagged concerns about the proliferation of CCTV cameras in public spaces. Privacy advocates focused on CCTV are particularly active in the UK, where studies suggest the average Londoner is caught on camera 300 times per day on average, and new technologies such as cameras that incorporate license plate readers have been adopted in smaller cities.

Daniels said he’s very familiar with these concerns, but was dismissive of the idea that security cameras in public space presented any sort of encroachment on personal privacy. “My own opinion is that I don’t believe I have an expectation to privacy in a public setting,” he said.

While Daniels noted that CommunityCam is the first-ever attempt to plot security cameras in an interactive online format, it’s not actually true. Last summer, European privacy activists who wished to draw attention to the proliferation of CCTV cameras led a game called “camspotting” in Brussels, part of an international activism effort known as “1984 Action Day.” After going out and logging camera locations, they plotted them on an online map.

Comments

It really messes with your painstakingly crafted illusion of the existence of other idiots who agree with the small abortion that lives in your head.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:57 pm

Man, it's just soooo confusing here.

Posted by anon on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 3:07 pm

you are just making shit up, David.
Why don't you come back when you find a real survey, instead of your imaginary one you're clinging to for comfort.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 21, 2013 @ 11:35 pm

that a poll of ordinary people, rather than the small subset of progressive activists that we see here, would yield an overwhelming majority in favour of camera's in public places.

Posted by anon on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 7:51 am

who would eagerly trade freedom for the illusion of security.
(Almost everyone you know.)

Posted by Gurst on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 8:06 am

almost no outrage from the voters about this.

Posted by anon on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 8:16 am

almost no outrage from the voters about this.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 8:34 am

We do have elections about transportation issues.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 10:30 am

So which election specifically were you referring to?

Posted by Mort on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 10:58 am

the status quo, "Mort".

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 11:10 am

Hey if you want to spend trillions of dollars to have cameras shoved up your ass for "security", that's cool by me. Just go do it somewhere else.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 11:33 am
Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:05 pm

Internet fuckwits like yourself are great at fellating authority and spewing unsubstantiated lies, but when it comes to real world accomplishments you just never really seem to materialize. Sad little internet troll.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:23 pm

It's already happening.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:40 pm

of your imaginary majority?
Because those don't really count.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 3:39 pm

encourage you to inform the SFBG editor that he is deluded.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 3:46 pm

"And I desperately need my daddy government to take care of me no matter how many trillions of dollars it costs!"
-Anonymous online "conservative" idiot

Posted by Paul S. on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 8:10 am

voter support for CCTV's and other forms of surveillance continues to be very high.

There is also little public support for Manning, Snowden and all the rest.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 8:19 am

You clearly have something to hide. You are hiding your identity. Is it because your inability to think critically causes you shame? That's ok little fella. Here comes a nice big policeman to hug away your tears til you feel all better.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 9:00 am

Priceless. You can't make this stuff up.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 10:30 am

One of them claims to have nothing to hide while hiding his identity.
The other supports privacy while hiding his identity.
The first one is really stupid, like you, and the second one is rational, like the majority of Americans who are opposed to government wiener fondling and destruction of the Constitution.
Hopefully this won't ruin your hydrocephalic laugh fest.

Posted by Mort on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 11:21 am

That's very clever of you, "Mort".

Posted by Anon on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 11:37 am

Only stupid people are confused by it.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 12:50 pm

so I guess you're one of those stupid people.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 1:36 pm

I just don't give a fuck which anal fissure you are.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 1:46 pm

Quit while you're only way behind.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 1:56 pm

Newsflash, Turdjuggler: anal fissures like yourself can be suffered by men, women, straight, gay, they just don't make no nevermind. Look it up, see the picture of yourself, knock yourself out and gain at least one piece of knowledge.
First you were pathetic, now you're confused and desperate. Still stupid, though. Staggeringly stupid.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:14 pm

the word "behind". You must be a hoot at parties.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 22, 2013 @ 2:23 pm

crocs 激安

Posted by 時計 高級 on Sep. 09, 2013 @ 5:30 pm

I really want to thank you for your great article. It was really helpful.
PS4 Controller Shell

Posted by Guest on Dec. 14, 2013 @ 2:31 pm

Shop 2013 hot original Japanese Kigurumi animal onesies, Kigurumi animal pyjamas for men,women and baby are here to fit your coplay or costume.
animal onesies
totoro onesie
pikachu onesie

Posted by animal onesies on Dec. 16, 2013 @ 5:52 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Also from this author

  • Police provide explanation of Bernal Heights Park shooting at emotional town hall meeting

  • San Francisco's untouchables

    Is San Francisco trying to help the homeless -- or drive them away?

  • Draining the tank

    Students push UC system to divest from fossil fuels, joining an international movement gathering soon in San Francisco