PG&E: Profits over safety


You have to love the way the lawyer from TURN (The Utility Reform Network) put PG&E's Vice President Jane Yura on the spot during hearings on the San Bruno pipeline disaster. There was lots of back and forth about the company's ad campaign and whether PG&E had "lost its way," which is what the Chron played up, but here's the bigger issue, buried deep in the story:

 Long also asked Yura about PG&E's reaction to the findings of a blue-ribbon panel that the utilities commission created to look into the disaster. The panel concluded that PG&E had been more concerned about profits than safety. "I would say I personally don't know that we disagree or agree," Yura said. "We have accepted it."

I could go futher: PG&E was more concerned about executive compensation that safety, being as money that we earmarked for gas-line upgrades instead went to bonuses for the top people.

You wonder how long it's going to take for people to realize that the needs of consumers, alternative energy, and safety are never going to be the priority for a private utility. Remember what happened when the state Legislature gave PG&E its way and deregulated electricity in CA? I do. I lived through the rolling blackouts, when Enron stole about $40 billion from California and the electricity grid almost collapsed.

That's what happens when you worry more about profits (and pay) than public service.


Posted by anon on Jan. 17, 2013 @ 4:38 pm

Public power won in 2001. That election was stolen. And no, we won't get over it.

Posted by Greg on Jan. 17, 2013 @ 10:47 pm

and just about every mayoral race. Summary:

If progressives win an election, like with the ill-fated Ross, it's a major mandate from the people.

If progressives lose a debate, it was stolen, or bought, or there was voter fraud, or (substitute your own lame excuse).

What a stramge planet you live on. Even the appalling Brugmann has STFU about public power. If he's moved on, so should you. Tim's just going thru the motions here. He knows he lost on this too - he just won't say so publicly.

Posted by anon on Jan. 18, 2013 @ 7:57 am

anon, Lucretia Snapples, Troll II, D.native, matlock, etc.

Posted by lillipublicans on Jan. 18, 2013 @ 8:56 am

must get a little tiered of trotting out the same conspiracy theories every thing you lose an election, which of course is almost every time there is an election.

I'm surprized you're not blaming your election losses on trolls.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 18, 2013 @ 10:08 am

These subjects are covered as part of the on-line Aruba certification exam. It is assumed that all candidates for this Aruba certification will have completed Aruba's Implementing Aruba WLANs (IAW) course. For convenience, candidates are automatically registered for and administered the ACMA exam upon completing the IAW course.

Posted by sfbg Cert Exam on Feb. 19, 2013 @ 1:40 am

Related articles

  • Exposing PG&E's other "cozy relationship," with Mayor Ed Lee

  • Dangerous delays

    Four years after the San Bruno disaster, PG&E still isn't fixing its potentially faulty natural gas pipelines on schedule

  • SF may go through Marin County to bypass CleanPowerSF subversion