Governor signs high-speed rail funding bill at Transbay Terminal

|
(8)
Gov. Jerry Brown signs SB 1029 at Transbay Terminal.
Mike Koozmin

The mood was jubilant at the Transbay Terminal construction site in downtown San Francisco this afternoon as political leaders gathered to watch Gov. Jerry Brown sign Senate Bill 1029, the hard-won recent authorization for selling the first $4.7 billion in state bonds to fund the California High-Speed Rail Project.

That money – part of the $10 billion that voters approved for the project in 2008 – and $7.9 billion in federal matching funds will go mostly to build the first high-speed rail section linking Merced to the San Fernando Valley. But it also includes money for related projects in the Bay Area, including $820 million to electrify and improve the Caltrain tracks that the project will share, $145 million for BART replacement cars and track improvements, and $61 million for SF's Central Subway project.

The fact that Brown chose Transbay Terminal – the northern terminus for trains expected to travel at up to 220 mph between there and Los Angeles' Union Station in less than three hours by the year 2027 – was an indicator of his focus on the long-term benefits of the project rather than its immediate impacts, a theme he emphasized in his speech.

“What this is about is investing in the future,” he said, pointing to the high-rises around him and noting how they were also the products of people with long-term vision. “The buildings that are up here didn't come out of fear, they came from bold risk-taking.”

High-speed rail has been under increasing criticism from conservatives who complain about its cost (the total project cost is estimated at about $68 billion) and SB 1029 squeaked through the Legislation, with not a vote to spare in the Senate, where President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and other political leaders had to twist arms to get it done.

“The people know we can cut, the people know we can patch and mend, but the skeptics wonder whether we have the will to build,” Steinberg said at the event, which he said answered that question. “This is about economic vitality.”

Mayor Ed Lee praised state leaders for moving the project forward and said, “This project means more than just celebrating a great transit system, which high-speed rail is,” noting that the overall Transbay Terminal project will also include about 40,000 new residential units being built on a dozen surrounding buildings, including what will be the tallest on the West Coast.

But that project has its critics, including Quentin Kopp, the retired judge and former legislator who sponsored the bill that created the California High-Speed Rail Project and was the first chair of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. He has derided Transbay Terminal as simply a “real estate deal,” noting that the tunnel from there to the Caltrain station is too expensive, still unfunded, and shouldn't be built.

Asked about that $1 billion-plus funding shortfall, Brown replied, “Let's see the first phase, then the second phase, then we'll figure out how to get it here.” He criticized the “NIMBYs and fearful men” and emphasized the long view of the project: “I signed my first high-speed rail bill 30 years ago. It's taken some time to get this going.”

Several speakers cast the project as an obligation to future generations. Deputy US Secretary of Transportation John D. Porcari said most of the country's most important infrastructure we enjoy today was built by past generations, and he asked, “Are we doing right by the next generation? Are we paying it forward?”

Comments

Sue Hestor is reading a lawsuit to halt construction.

Posted by Troll II on Jul. 18, 2012 @ 5:10 pm

She thinks small and has no stomach to take on State and Federal agencies.

Plus she really has no funding. Non-issue.

That said, I very much doubt the whole thing will be done by 2027. They'll build ther "easy" part i.e. the "train to nowhere" but extending into LA and Sf is the killer.

In Europe they'd just trample over everyone and build it; here, not so much because everyone in the US is obsessed with their "rights".

Posted by Guest on Jul. 18, 2012 @ 11:00 pm

Future generations in California will not even have enough toilet water to drink.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 19, 2012 @ 10:17 am
Posted by Guest on Jul. 19, 2012 @ 6:35 pm

the high-speed train...to Merced!

Posted by Chromefields on Jul. 20, 2012 @ 8:30 am

The total price for the system is supposedly $68 billion---a serious underestimate itself---and the Feds are supposedly going to pay $20 billion of that! The rest is supposed to come from local governments and private sources. Who can seriously believe that? It's pure fantasy and a big mistake. The Democratic Party and the unions are doing a great disservice to the people of California. Shameful.

The annual interest rate alone on the bonds just approved will be $300 million even as the state is destroying the state's education system with budget cuts.

Posted by Rob Anderson on Jul. 21, 2012 @ 9:05 am
neu

High-speed rail has been under increasing criticism from conservatives who complain about its cost (the total project cost is estimated at about $68 billion) and SB 1029 squeaked through the Legislation, with not a vote to spare in the Senate, where President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and other political leaders had to twist arms to get it done.

Posted by Zalando Gutschein on Oct. 22, 2012 @ 12:07 am
hey

But that project has its critics, including Quentin Kopp, the retired judge and former legislator who sponsored the bill that created the California High-Speed Rail Project and was the first chair of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. He has derided Transbay Terminal as simply a “real estate deal,” noting that the tunnel from there to the Caltrain station is too expensive, still unfunded, and shouldn't be built.

Posted by Ein anderer Aspekt sollte erwähnt werden on Oct. 22, 2012 @ 12:08 am