With more bikes on the roads, Folsom Street gets a makeover


As anyone who has traveled the streets of San Francisco knows, there's an increasing number of bicyclists out there. And the just-released biennial bike count from San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency attempts to quantify that increase: 14 percent since 2011.

The agency counted bikes at 51 key intersections around the city during the afternoon/evening commute from Sept. 10-19, counting a total of 23,225 bikes. Comparing 40 counted intersections in 2011, that's a 14 percent increase; or a 96 percent increase since 2005 when comparing the 20 intersections measured then.

The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition trumpeted the report as good news, including in its press release this quote from Mayor Ed Lee: "Every year we are seeing more people riding a bicycle in San Francisco, and the latest bicycle count data proves it." And SFBC Executive Director Leah Shahum said, "It's clear that if we build it, they will come. No other mode of transportation is growing as fast or has a higher return on investment in terms of improving our city for everyone."

But the reality is that the city is lagging far behind its own stated goals to make cycling a safer and more attractive transportation options, largely because of a severe underinvestment in its cycling network. The report notes that the city has invested $3.3 million in its bike network since 2011, but that was mostly playing catch-up from when a court injunction stalled all bike projects in the city for four years.

The SFMTA report doesn't calculate the critical number in terms of how we're really doing — transportation mode share, or the percentage of overall vehicle trips taken by bike — an estimate it is now working on in a separate study at the end of January.

An American Community Survey in 2012 put SF bike mode share at less than 4 percent, which is a far cry from the 20 percent by 2020 that is the city's official goal, one it has little chance of meeting without a serious increase in infrastructure investment and other changes. The SFMTA's own stated goal is 8-10 percent mode share by 2018, the result of failure to make needed investments, which amounts to an admission that the city's official goal is little more than political pandering.

"We're still moving forward on all the goals that we set to accomplish, but we do have funding needs," SFMTA spokesperson Paul Rose told us, instead emphasizing the agency's goal of attaining a 50-50 split between private automobile use and all other modes of transportation, including Muni and cycling.

The SFBC has worked in close partnership with the city, but the continuation of Shahum's quote in her press release also indicates that she'd like to see the city doing more to promote safe cycling: "It's time for the City to truly invest in our bicycle network, and ensure that our City's streets are welcoming and comfortable for the growing number of people riding."

But the city is moving forward with some bike improvements, including a makeover of Folsom Street now underway.

In the wake of some high-profile cases of motorists running over cyclists in San Francisco this year, including the Aug. 14 death of Amelie Le Moullac at the intersection of Folsom and 6th Streets, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency has taken a lane from drivers to create safer cycling along seven key blocks of fast-moving Folsom Street.

The project on one-way Folsom Street between 11th and 4th streets creates an extra wide bike lane with bright green cycling signage on the roadway, with that green lane narrowing and breaking up as it approaches the right turns on 10th, 8th, and 6th streets. The idea is communicate with both motorists and cyclists about how to safely merge and avoid having cars make the unsafe "right hook" turns that are dangerous to cyclists.


valuable space we can cede to what remains a very marginal form of transportation.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 17, 2013 @ 3:58 pm

If we remove enough car lanes, we can get automobile traffic cut in half, which will improve the quality of life for everyone who lives in San Francisco.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 17, 2013 @ 4:10 pm

congested, and you have more cars idling, which causes more pollution, delays and economic costs.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 17, 2013 @ 4:20 pm

Poll after poll has shown this.

Let's top playing a chicken and egg game.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 18, 2013 @ 2:46 pm

decent transit policy enables everyone and not just young, fit, healthy (and usually, white male) professionals.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 18, 2013 @ 3:00 pm

A little math here: If people using bikes' mode share is roughly 4% now, and if the annual increase is near 8% (probable rate from 2012 to 2013), then it will take 9 years for the bike mode share to double to 8% in 2022. (This is the rule of 72 -- how to calculate how long it takes for a raw number to double at an annual percentage growth rate.). A proven way to increase the share more quickly is to install more protected, buffered bike lanes, because it is this type of safety that concerns most people contemplating urban bike trips for themselves or their children. Other factors I think are secondary, but the introduction of electric bikes and the Copenhagen Wheel from MIT May provide a leap in bike use for every day errands and commuting.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 18, 2013 @ 5:02 pm

Oops, forgot to put my internet commenter name on my comment above re how to figure out when the bike share will double.

Posted by voltairesmistress on Dec. 18, 2013 @ 5:05 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.