Accrediting commission threatening to shutter City College gets scrutiny from Congress

US Rep. Jackie Speier pledges to reform the accreditation process during a Nov. 7 forum.

Federal politicians are blasting the commission that would close City College of San Francisco, calling the entire accreditation process a debacle.

At a forum US Rep. Jackie Speier (D-SF) and Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Palo Alto) convened at City College on Nov. 7, Speier trumpeted what local advocates have said all along: The evaluation of CCSF was bungled, lacked transparency, and violated federal education regulations, all pointing to a desperate need for reform of its accreditors.

Accreditation has been the means to check the quality of education in colleges, but now a growing chorus of critics says the process can be used to carry out an ideological agenda and usurp local control ("Whose college?" Aug. 13).

Yet upending the accreditation process could also have unintended consequences, perhaps letting corporate and conservative interests seize the chance to implement their long-simmering agendas.

Either way, it is beginning to look like the fight to save City College could end up being about more than just City College.



The Accrediting Commission of Community and Junior Colleges keeps a watchful eye on the community colleges of California, Guam, and Hawaii. After a six-year review, the ACCJC this summer rocked City College by terminating its accreditation, pending appeals before the sentence is carried out in July 2014.

At the forum, Speier said the debacle with the ACCJC signaled a need to reform accreditation on a national level, citing a lack of public accountability.

"I think the ACCJC has run amok, they have lost their vision — if they ever had one," Speier said in an interview after the forum. "They are riddled with conflicts of interest and arbitrariness."

Teachers, faculty, and education advocates packed City College's Diego Rivera Theater, all cheering at every jibe toward the ACCJC. Pressure on the group is mounting. A third lawsuit against the body was announced the day of the forum, this one filed by the activist group Save CCSF.

But Speier sees the problems as stemming from the US Department of Education, which she said needs the tools to correct problems at the ACCJC, something she plans to meet with Education Secretary Arne Duncan to discuss.

"The Department of Education only has one hammer, and that is to deny the ACCJC certification," she said.

The group is slated to undergo this evaluation in December, which could spell its end. But if the fight for City College sparks a change in accreditation nationally, what would take its place?

There are wolves at the door of the US education system, for-profit colleges with a history of taking vulnerable students to the bank with nothing to show for it. And they want accreditation reform too.



The ideological argument between the ACCJC and City College is taking place nationally.

President Obama called for a change to college accreditation in his last State of the Union speech, calling for higher graduation and transfer rates for community colleges (see "Who killed City College?" July 9).

One of the biggest cheerleaders of the president's reform is the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. At a conference it held on accreditation last month, AEI and its partners lampooned accreditation as it stands now.

"This is a system that is flawed, unable to deal with the rapidly changing higher education landscape," Anne D. Neal, a partner of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a national education reform group, said at the conference. "If meat inspections were as loose as college accreditation... most of us would have mad cow disease."


Nor that it shouldn't close.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 12, 2013 @ 6:17 pm

...are running a massive nationwide campaign to privatize and profitize education, and gut it of its last vestiges of challenging corporate interest; and City College is prime in their cynical crosshairs for attack and takeover.

This is about whether corporations, or our community, will run education in San Francisco.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Nov. 12, 2013 @ 10:53 pm

You've still got some convincing to do here.

Posted by Lucretia Snapples on Nov. 12, 2013 @ 11:57 pm

he can always quickly come up with one when he feels that he needs one, which is constantly.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 13, 2013 @ 8:52 am

...are making no secret of their privatization of U.S. schools, so your going on about 'conspiracy theories' seems to be a conspiracy theory of its own.


Just do a search for:

Gates Lumina privatize education

There's nothing secret about this stuff at all.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Nov. 13, 2013 @ 12:08 pm

simple fact that CCSF has failed on multiple levels.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 13, 2013 @ 12:35 pm

this is simply a barricade against trolls

it is a signpost to indicate to the reader that other anonymous posters on this thread are beginning to purposely diminish the conversation into repetitive deceptions, reactionary hyperbole, and/or petty, mean spirited personal attacks and irrelevant bickering

the barrier is put in place to signal that there is probably little point in reading more replies in the thread past this point

proceed at your own risk

Posted by nbdsfjl on Nov. 13, 2013 @ 12:57 pm

The battle with ACCJC has always been about much more than CCSF. As CSM Chancellor Galatolo said, he realized there was something seriously wrong with ACCJC years ago. Thank you to the public officials and college leaders for speaking up! Let the haters (see 'guest' above) spew their venom. Nobody cares any more.

Posted by Rick Sterling on Nov. 12, 2013 @ 9:53 pm

The accreditation process is sound. The problem is that ACCJC has a rogue leader in Dr. Beno, who has mismanaged the entire operation and used it to further her unique vision for community colleges, and especially those in California. She is the prime example of "those who can't teach, administrate, and those who can't administrate, regulate, consult, or lobby" The commission needs a new leader who will have integrity, ethics, intelligence, and management skills.

Posted by Magpie on Nov. 13, 2013 @ 7:00 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.