Still secret

SFPD won't allow public oversight of its surveillance work with the FBI, despite high-profile legislation requiring it

|
(22)

news@sfbg.com
A high-profile local civil rights ordinance passed last year to shine light on the San Francisco Police Department's joint activities with the FBI has been undermined by the SFPD's refusal to disclose its surveillance activities. This comes at a time when the public is learning more than ever about the federal government's intrusion into the privacy of law-abiding US citizens.

In May 2012, the Board of Supervisors unanimously passed the Safe San Francisco Civil Rights Ordinance, which Mayor Ed Lee signed in a photo-op ceremony with Police Chief Greg Suhr and the activists who supported it. They claimed the board's passage of the ordinance ushered in a new era of transparency over the SFPD's previously secretive work with the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force.

"The ordinance basically requires three things," Nasrina Bargzie, a civil rights attorney at the Asian Law Caucus who worked on the measure, told the Bay Guardian. "The first part requires that the Police Department work with the JTTF has to follow the California constitutional rights of privacy, so they're not following the lax standards of the [US] Department of Justice. The second part is that they can no longer enter into any secret agreements with the FBI; it has to go before the Police Commission in a public setting. The final part of the ordinance exists to make sure the rules are being followed, so there is a requirement for a yearly report."

At the time of its passage, activists told the Guardian that the ordinance was only as strong as the SFPD's willingness to disclose its activities (see "Mayor Lee signs watered-down limits on SFPD spying," 5/9/12). But the SFPD's refusal to disclose even minimal, basic information calls into question the ordinance's value.

After the release of multiple reports earlier this year that activists called inadequate, Suhr is now maintaining silence regarding the JTTF, while claiming the department is in full compliance with the ordinance. According to Bargzie, Suhr told her the FBI is barring him from disclosing the requested information.

Following multiple efforts by the Guardian to get a comment out of SFPD about the ordinance and whether the department was indeed taking a subservient role to the FBI, SFPD Sgt. Dennis Toomer told us, "We're not talking about that at all."

LACK OF RESPONSE

Activists have sparred with Chief Suhr over implementation of the ordinance and its required annual report since at least the beginning of 2013.

Deputy Chief John Loftus presented the first report to the Police Commission on Jan. 23, which claimed the SFPD was in "full compliance" with the ordinance without providing any details. Activists and the public quickly demanded a real response.

"The commission presented this short oral report, which was a little short of two minutes long," Bargzie told us. "There was no data that we were not already aware of. It was just basic statements claiming that they were complying with the ordinance."

Suhr apologized for the omissions while stating his department was still in compliance with the ordinance's guidelines, pledging to be more forthcoming. At this time, SFPD Sgt. Michael Andraychak told the Guardian: "The Chief's Office is in the process of scheduling meetings with Nasrina Bargzie [of the Asian Law Caucus] to develop a report with more detail so those concerned and the public can be as informed as possible. Chief Suhr is committed to remain in compliance with the ordinance."

The Coalition for Safe San Francisco, an activist group consisting of Muslim Legal Fund of America, Asian Law Caucus, and dozens of other groups, met with Suhr to discuss setting up a template for the reports.

Suhr then released a second report, which contained more relevant information, stating that SFPD officers did not act as informants in 2012 and three full-time SFPD officers were assigned to the JTTF.

Comments

Thank you for some other fantastic article. The place else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal way of
writing? I have a presentation next week, and I'm at
the look for such info.

Look at my website - UK office blog ([url=https://ukofficeblog.wordpress.com/]https://ukofficeblog.wordpress.com/[/url])

Posted by https://ukofficeblog.wordpress.com/ on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 4:51 am

Your style is very unique in comparison to other people
I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you've got
the opportunity, Guess I'll just book mark this site.

Posted by money borrowing sites on Sep. 27, 2013 @ 6:21 pm

they are supposed to be, er, secret.

See, if you know I am spying on you then you won't give away all the bad things you are doing.

Shocking huh?

Posted by Guest on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 5:44 am

The Ordinance report doesn't ask that the SFPD disclose who they are spying on. It requests basic information to show that the SFPD and JTTF are abiding by DGO 8.10 and not infringing on 1st amendment protected activity. It does not ask for the names of high profile terrorist groups they may be spying on.

Posted by Alex on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 11:57 am

disclose and it isn't always possible to determine ahead of time what disclosures might compromise our security.

I feel very comfortable with the secret services operating with secrecy, and I'd be suspect about anyone who doesn't hold that view.

If the authorities assert that they are not infringing on the 1st without good cause, that seems good enough.

Posted by anon on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 4:21 pm

the perfect subject of an authoritarian society. Trust the authorities without any accountability.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 4:38 pm

trust various groups who spends all their time and energy trying to undermine our society, then yes, I trust the authorities.

Then again, I have nothing to hide, and maybe that isn't true for you.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 05, 2013 @ 4:49 pm

It's awesome to visit this web page and reading
the views of all friends concerning this post, while I am also zealous of getting experience.

Posted by Tracker on Sep. 17, 2013 @ 10:36 am

Wow that was odd. I just wrote an really long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn't appear.
Grrrr... well I'm not writing all that over again.

Anyhow, just wanted to say fantastic blog!

Posted by savings and loans on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 10:16 am

Great site. A lot of useful info here. I'm sending it to some friends ans also sharing in delicious.
And naturally, thank you to your sweat!

Posted by online loans uk on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 3:17 pm

Excellent post. I certainly love this website. Keep it up!

Posted by personal loans in singapore on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 10:38 pm

constantly i used to read smaller articles that as well clear their motive, and
that is also happening with this post which I am reading here.

Posted by bad credit payday loan on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 11:03 pm

When some one searches for his necessary thing, thus he/she desires to be
available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained
over here.

Posted by fast approval payday loans on Sep. 27, 2013 @ 8:16 am

I'm really impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on
your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it
yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one
nowadays.

Posted by lending network on Sep. 23, 2013 @ 6:31 am

Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog!

We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in
a community in the same niche. Your blog provided
us valuable information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!

Posted by need cash today on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 4:28 pm

The other day, while I was at work, my cousin stole my
iPad and tested to see if it can survive a thirty foot drop,
just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now broken and she has 83 views.
I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

Posted by money lending companies on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 8:50 pm

Appreciate the recommendation. Will try it out.

Posted by payday loans uk on Sep. 23, 2013 @ 2:36 am

I am not sure where you're getting your information, but great topic.
I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
Thanks for wonderful information I was looking for this info for my mission.

Posted by secure online payday loans on Sep. 26, 2013 @ 10:53 pm

Wow, awesome blog format! How long have you ever been blogging for?
you make running a blog look easy. The whole glance of your
web site is great, as neatly as the content material!

Posted by payday loans in georgia on Oct. 03, 2013 @ 10:40 am

Excellent write-up. I certainly love this website. Continue the good work!

Posted by faxless payday loan on Sep. 24, 2013 @ 2:36 am

One of the more spectacular District 6 events occured in the aftermath of the Kim-sponsored SSFCRO legislation regarding local-federal cooperation: the death of Dennis Hughes in May 2012: http://www.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/suspect-in-mothers-death-shot-dea...

Posted by a_rose_5000 on Sep. 24, 2013 @ 8:27 pm

RIP Dennis Hughes

Posted by a_rose_5000 on Sep. 24, 2013 @ 8:28 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Also from this author

  • Privatizing the Botanical Gardens

    Non-resident fees, exclusive events, and the transfer to a private group compromise what was a natural gathering spot

  • Beginning on broke

    Mayor Lee falling short on youth employment pledge as millennials face tough job market

  • Small Business Commissioners support Pet Food Express over local stores