The meaning of Manning

What to take from SF Pride's bumblings and shut-outs? Maybe we're not so equal, after all

|
(8)
Shut-out signs: Protesters at the May 8 Pride meeting found the official body cared little for their DIY rally cries.

 

marke@sfbg.com

OPINION And so Pride has come to this: what began as a ragtag, radical potluck of perverts, fairies, and criminals (which is what we were in the early 1970s), celebrating the grassroots uprising that birthed the gay rights movement, is now a sleek, corporate-sponsored, multimillion dollar mega-event that refuses to engage with its own community.

From Stonewall to stonewalling. From protesting the Vietnam War and police oppression to "protecting" the military from any symbolic statement about its conduct or mismanagement during Iraq and Afghanistan. What's going on?

"I live in a bubble, I guess I was naive when it came to how badly and inappropriately the Pride Board would react," Joey Cain, the Radical Faerie elder and former Pride Community Grand Marshal who nominated Bradley Manning for the position, told me. (The full backstory of Wikileaker Manning's election to grand marshal and the resulting firestorm? Here you are.) "Of course, I knew he was controversial — I hoped to bring more attention to him in the community at large and celebrate what he did. This is San Francisco, I thought it wouldn't be a big deal."

"When I heard he'd been elected, I smiled, shrugged, and went on with my day. I had no idea it would blow up like this," said Tom Temprano, young president of the progressive Harvey Milk Democratic Club, whose monthly meeting last week became a de facto forum on Pride's rescission of Manning's election, after the Pride Board announced via Facebook that it was cancelling its scheduled public meeting and that "the discussion of that matter is closed for this year."

Indeed, Pride's own utter ineptitude in handling this situation would be hilarious if it didn't smack so much of outright disdain for the community it represents. It's as if Pride board president Lisa Williams and CEO Earl Plante, specifically hired to repair Pride's nagging budgetary and communication problems, have clumsily ripped a page from the "War on Terror," or the BP oil spill, or Too Big To Fail. Press lockouts, media blackouts, decision by fiat, a complete lack of transparency, internal investigations, contested elections, massive flip-flops, a widely known but officially unnamed staffer fired and bound by contract not to speak about the incident.... add to all that surreptitiously deleted Facebook comments and a wacky story about Plante disappearing for days throughout the whole controversy due to "hitting his head," and you pretty much have Borat in the Bush War Room.

Calm down honeys, it's just Pride. Pour yourself a Bud Light and chill.

Manning's election probably would have been celebrated by most of San Francisco in the Wikileaks heyday of late '00s, when the tech scene was still streaked with misfit visionaries and data libertarians, our mayor was given to spouting utopian pronouncements that caused national headscratching, and the anti-war protest energy of the Bush era hadn't been completely subsumed by domestic economic concerns (or whatever happened to that energy).

And maybe a majority of locals don't have any objection to Manning, a queer person who did something, being honored at Pride, if they know who Manning is. Yet to the rest of the country — and to some gay military organizations perhaps still traumatized by Don't Ask Don't Tell, who reportedly flooded Pride with calls demanding that Pride rescind the Manning election — the advances we've made in terms of assimilation and tolerance are like a fragile egg that must be protected at all costs.

Comments

This will only get worse so long as the people who've been paid to rep San Franciscans in the rezoning and development wars and ended up losing not only the land use debates but the control of the housing discourse and the Board of Supervisors, continue to get paid. The people who were unable to keep us from getting into this mess will not be the ones to get us out of it, they will only dig us in deeper.

Posted by Guest on May. 22, 2013 @ 12:56 pm

Nobody thinks like you, believes in the same values as you, or wants the same things as you. So stop using "us/we" when no one has given you any authority to think, speak or act for any of the rest of us.

The Bay Guardian seems to attract these paternalistic commenters (anon, lilli, many others) who keep telling the rest of us what we should want. But a city is made up of tens of thousands of people, many of whom don't even know what they want, but may have a good idea of what they don't want. If you feel the need to tell other people what they want, or should want, or what was "good" or "bad," go find a farm to live where you can't bother anyone else since no one in a city wants a paternalistic overlard to tell them what to think or what they should want. Or at least follow Johnny Vennom's lead and post your own articles under your own name so we can learn to either enjoy them or dismiss them, just as I've come to dislike his argry, stilted worldview.

For such a so-called "accepting" city the SFBG website comment section sure attracts a lot of myopic, hateful, and condescending posters. Do us - strike that - me a favor and go find some other pisshole to spew your negativity. You have none of the gracious and positive attributes needed to survive in a large, diverse, cosmopolitan city, much less enrich its discourse and outcomes. The attitude displayed in your comment is exactly why the city ends up with politicians like Mayors Lee and Newsome since the "progressive" alternatives often seem to display the same condescending, authoritative attitudes about what the rest of us should think.

Posted by Guest on May. 22, 2013 @ 2:03 pm

So you know your view is the minority view.

Posted by Guest on May. 22, 2013 @ 2:18 pm

I every time emasiled this blog post page to all my contacts, for the reason that if like to read it aftrer thzt myy links will too.

Posted by race games on May. 28, 2014 @ 9:40 pm

Well said and about time someone said it! Bravo.

Posted by Hector on May. 22, 2013 @ 4:27 pm

Whats up very cool web site!! Guy .. Beautiful ..
Wonderful .. I wilpl bookmark yyour weebsite and take the feeds also?
I'm happy too seek oout numerous useful info right here in the submit,
we want develop extra techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing..
. . . .

Posted by cool race car games on May. 28, 2014 @ 9:12 pm

Ithink everything wrote mafe a ton of sense. But, what
about this? what if yoou added a little information?
I mean, I don't wabt to tell you how to run youir blog, but suppose you aded something to maybe grab a person's attention? I mean Thee
meaning of Manning is a little plain. You might glance aat Yahoo's home page and see how they write post titles to grab pekple interested.

You might try adding a video or a pic orr two to get readers interested about what you've
got to say. In mmy opinion, it might bring your blog a ittle bit more interesting.

Posted by games racing cars on Jun. 01, 2014 @ 10:22 pm

SF Pride's board demonstrated how intellectually bankrupt, morally obtuse, authoritarian, politically myopic, sycophantically militaristic, and arrogant they are, proving beyond all doubt that Bradley Manning has more integrity in his little finger than the whole sad lot of them.

Has SF Pride's board forgotten, or indeed ever known, what freedom really is?

A gay man has been, is being tortured because he had the audacity to disclose the cynical and illegal actions of our government. The murder of civilians by an occupying force is a war crime, or at least it used to be.

The world needs a whole lot more Bradley Mannings and a whole lot fewer of Pride's corporate quislings.

Posted by Todd on May. 22, 2013 @ 11:37 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.