Editor's notes

Is tech abiding by the country's social contract? And why should we care?

|
(2)

tredmond@sfbg.com

EDITORS NOTES Jaron Lanier is not a Luddite. He's one of the most brilliant technologists in the world, the virtual inventor of virtual reality and one of the first people calling for information (and music) to be free. He was a tech giant when most of today's tech titans were in their disposable diapers. So when he starts talking about how the Internet is destroying the middle class, everybody ought to listen.

And that's exactly what he saying in his new book, Who Owns the Future?

Lanier is 53; he's been around long enough to see some of the best promises our modern industrial era turn out to be failures or lies. He's got a little perspective on things — and he's not happy with what he's seeing.

We all know American capitalism is a force for disruption and destruction as well as creativity and creation. We all know that industries are born and die. The automobile replaced the horse and buggy. And in a lot of today's conventional thinking, the tech revolution is just another step in the same direction.

Lanier has another perspective. The current light-speed, youth-driven tech economy has undermined the social contract that has been part of the United States political and economic systems since the Great Depression: People ought to have the right to job security, a decent wage, and the chance to have a family and grow old.

In an interview with Salon, Lanier notes:

"We don't realize that our society and our democracy ultimately rest on the stability of middle-class jobs. When I talk to libertarians and socialists, they have this weird belief that everybody's this abstract robot that won't ever get sick or have kids or get old. It's like everybody's this eternal freelancer who can afford downtime and can self-fund until they find their magic moment or something.

"The way society actually works is there's some mechanism of basic stability so that the majority of people can outspend the elite so we can have a democracy. That's the thing we're destroying, and that's really the thing I'm hoping to preserve. So we can look at musicians and artists and journalists as the canaries in the coal mine, and is this the precedent that we want to follow for our doctors and lawyers and nurses and everybody else? Because technology will get to everybody eventually."

Hey Googlers and Twitterati and Facebookians: You should listen, sometimes, to your elders.

Comments

Wow, you must have nailed it, as no one has replied yet?
The real question is; where is the value in digital activity?
What is actually produced? Who profits? Society as a whole,
or the New Robber Barons?
Since I have been a tech geek since I was a child 147 years ago,
I have the ability to put today's gadgets in perspective.
The ability to send an email, Google a subject, and Wikipedia
are enormous advances. Gaming, texting, and most other "social"
activity? The jury is out.....

Posted by TrollKiller on May. 20, 2013 @ 10:49 am

When the same topic was broached on the politics blog, it had lots of comments.

Posted by Guest on May. 20, 2013 @ 11:38 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.