Mrs. Wilsey's fine art - Page 3

Wealthy socialite enlists Fine Arts Museums staff to help with her personal art collection

|
(66)
Fine Arts Museums staff helped ship "The Pink Blouse" by Henri Matisse. It belongs to Board of Trustees President Dede Wilsey.
SF EXAMINER PHOTO OF WILSEY BY CINDY CHEW

The code of ethics at the Boston Science Museum put it quite clearly: "When Museum of Science Trustees seek staff assistance for personal needs they should not expect that such help will be rendered to an extent greater than that available to a member of the general public in similar circumstances or with similar needs."

It's unlikely that a member of the general public who wanted to ship artworks would have the staff of the de Young at his or her disposal.

The Guardian telephoned a number believed to be Wilsey's seeking comment, and was greeted with a receptionist who answered with the bright greeting, "Wilsey residence!" After being informed that Wilsey was traveling, we requested comment from her via email, explaining that documentation appeared to show use of museum time to manage her personal art collection. She had not responded by press time.

Ken Garcia, press spokesman for the Museums, told us "there are situations in which the museum facilitates loans to the Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums (COFAM), loans to other museums, and in other ways assists with the care and handling of artworks for private collectors, including trustees when there is significant value to our museum." He added: "The reasons for museum staff to have handled the board president's private art collection reflect standard practice for exhibitions and loans."

He noted: "Reproductions of artworks (2D) are routinely requested by collectors when the loan of a picture conflicts with the lenders need for privacy, represents a potential security issue, or interrupts the continuity of the enjoyment of a collection. FAMSF provides for the photographic reproduction of artworks as an appreciative acknowledgment of the negotiated loan. Mrs. Wilsey has on occasion requested a reproduction be made of a loaned picture but on each occasion has generously assumed responsibility for the associated costs."

Maybe it's all perfectly fine and normal, "standard practice." But there's a lot of it going on, and some is at the very least curious.

Comments

Posted by lillipublicans on Mar. 02, 2013 @ 8:09 pm
Posted by lillipublicans on Mar. 02, 2013 @ 5:47 pm

You make it too easy.

Posted by Lucretia Snapples on Mar. 02, 2013 @ 6:06 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhRUe-gz690

[battle sounds]
[Black Knight defeats another knight in a bloody battle as Arthur watches]

ARTHUR:You fight with the strength of many men, Sir Knight.
[pause]
I am Arthur, King of the Britons.
[pause]
I seek the finest and the bravest knights in the land to join me in my Court of Camelot.
[pause]
You have proved yourself worthy; will you join me?
[pause]
You make me sad. So be it. Come, Patsy.

BLACK KNIGHT: None shall pass.

ARTHUR: What?

BLACK KNIGHT: None shall pass.

ARTHUR: I have no quarrel with you, good Sir knight, but I must cross this bridge.

BLACK KNIGHT: Then you shall die.

ARTHUR: I command you as King of the Britons to stand aside!

BLACK KNIGHT: I move for no man.

ARTHUR: So be it!

[hah]

[parry thrust]

[ARTHUR chops the BLACK KNIGHT's left arm off after a short battle]

ARTHUR: Now stand aside, worthy adversary.

BLACK KNIGHT: 'Tis but a scratch.

ARTHUR: A scratch? Your arm's off!

BLACK KNIGHT: No, it isn't.

ARTHUR: Well, what's that then?

BLACK KNIGHT: I've had worse.

ARTHUR: You liar!

BLACK KNIGHT: Come on you pansy!

[hah]

[parry thrust]

[ARTHUR chops the BLACK KNIGHT's right arm off]

ARTHUR: Victory is mine! [kneeling] We thank thee Lord, that in thy merc-

[Black Knight kicks Arthur in the head while he is praying]

BLACK KNIGHT: Come on then.

ARTHUR: What?

BLACK KNIGHT: Have at you!

ARTHUR: You are indeed brave, Sir knight, but the fight is mine.

BLACK KNIGHT: Oh, had enough, eh?

ARTHUR: Look, you stupid bastard, you've got no arms left.

BLACK KNIGHT: Yes I have.

ARTHUR: Look!

BLACK KNIGHT: Just a flesh wound.

[Headbutts Arthur in the chest]

ARTHUR: Look, stop that.

BLACK KNIGHT: Chicken! Chicken!

ARTHUR: Look, I'll have your leg. Right! [whop]

BLACK KNIGHT: Right, I'll do you for that!

ARTHUR: You'll what?

BLACK KNIGHT: Come 'ere!

ARTHUR: What are you going to do, bleed on me?

BLACK KNIGHT: I'm invincible!

ARTHUR: You're a loony.

BLACK KNIGHT: The Black Knight always triumphs! Have at you! Come on then.

[whop]

[ARTHUR chops the BLACK KNIGHT's other leg off]

BLACK KNIGHT: All right; we'll call it a draw.

ARTHUR: Come, Patsy.

BLACK KNIGHT: Oh, oh, I see, running away, 'eh? ... You yellow bastards! Come back here and take what's coming to you.... I'll bite your legs off!

Posted by marcos on Mar. 02, 2013 @ 12:16 pm

Ah I see, you prefer high ticket prostitution. Wilsey may have done a lot for SF but it sounds like SF has done plenty for her as well. But I guess there's never supposed to be any need to wonder about what she is doing with SF tax dollars - move along, nothing to see here.

Posted by kyoung on Mar. 22, 2013 @ 9:02 pm

then this is a non issue. Museums often have exhibitions of art works that are privately owned since otherwise they would never been seen at all. Why would that be better?

If the Mona Lisa were privately owned, would it be wrong for a museum to show it? And to care for it?

Posted by Guest on Mar. 01, 2013 @ 12:02 pm

Isn't this whole point of government to shovel the resources of the unwashed masses into big piles so that the already rich can readily feast on it?

Posted by marcos on Mar. 01, 2013 @ 12:14 pm

packed on the one "free" day a month? Ditto the De Young, and so on.

Posted by Guest on Mar. 01, 2013 @ 12:27 pm

It's just a means for her to save on those terribly unfair taxes. People of such finer sensibility need to be in position of telling us what art is and the fact that she's hit on a nifty color coding system should be seen as a boon to us all.

I like the pink clown art the most.

Posted by u spill bacillin on Mar. 01, 2013 @ 7:35 pm
Posted by Lucretius Snappus on Mar. 02, 2013 @ 11:35 am

non issue-based personality conflicts between generally thoughtful commenters to be counterproductive. Focus your energies combating stupidity. There is plenty of it evident in the comments on this website, especially from Lucretia Snapples and anon.

Down with stupidity!!!

Power to the thoughtful!!!

Posted by San Francisco Anti-Stupidity Campaign on Mar. 03, 2013 @ 12:37 am

What is the story, we had woman who owns painting, stored and then shipped from the FAMSF, a woman who has given time and money and more time and money. She used staff to help crate the art to Portland, I know places loan out each others art, still I don't see the story. Yes she had the staff help, like I said before she has given money and time, she will give more money and time.

We have other problems to solve, other stories to write and to be read. Graft, green and corruption. I don't care about a woman who had a painting that she loaned out, they shipped it to Portland.

I like Henri Matisse, if the art work will benefit the people of San Francisco, Portland, the FAMSF and the art lover of the world. I am fine with it.

Posted by Garrett on Mar. 06, 2013 @ 2:16 pm

I am distraught that you don't have a newer photo of Mrs. Wilsey holding her tasteful jewel-encrusted clutch, custom made in the shape of her late canine companion.

Posted by War Against Terrorism on Mar. 07, 2013 @ 1:39 pm

Deedster,

If you want your art stored, moved, or packed, try calling Atthowe Fine Art Services, they can be found at

www.atthowe.com

In the meantime, you should stop scamming on museum resrouces, they are ours not yours. And furthermore, you should pay back what you owe the city and county of SF for your thievery.

Posted by Guest on Mar. 18, 2013 @ 6:07 am

I'm actually a Republican. I used to be a hipster anarchist but now live in the 'burbs of SF, happily I might add. And we're contributing members to the museum.

Wilsey is completely wrong, completely awful and she should not be using the taxpayers resources for her personal art collection. She can call someone else and PAY THEM to pack and store her important pink art.

Speaking of the left, the left runs this city, and why isn't anything being done about this on the SF council? Well?

Posted by Guest on Apr. 28, 2013 @ 12:27 am

Wait so they loaned out a custom piece of art to someone? sounds fishy to me
if they can trace a single custom koozie then why is that hard for a painting?

Posted by Guest on May. 11, 2013 @ 9:52 pm

Related articles

  • Utopia, mon amour

    Arthur Tress, Bucky Fuller, and Harry Hay exhibits offer engagement and transcendence

  • Nite Trax: The fabulous creatures of Gaultier's opening gala

  • Barbie gets a makeover, San Francisco-style

  • Also from this author

  • Police provide explanation of Bernal Heights Park shooting at emotional town hall meeting

  • San Francisco's untouchables

    Is San Francisco trying to help the homeless -- or drive them away?

  • Draining the tank

    Students push UC system to divest from fossil fuels, joining an international movement gathering soon in San Francisco