Domestic violence is not a private matter

It's a serious crime -- but calls to remove the sheriff smack of political opportunism

|
(3)

EDITORIAL The legal case against Sheriff Ross Mirkarmi has been essentially settled, with the sheriff pleading guilty to false imprisonment and avoiding a trial on domestic violence charges, but the political case is just beginning.

Already, there are calls for Mirkarimi to step down. And Mayor Ed Lee announced March 12 that he's Mirkarimi's plea to "a very serious charge that had introduce a new set of legal issues" merits a thorough review.

That could lead to an explosive scenario where the Board of Supervisors, in an election year, would have to vote on whether to remove a sheriff who many of the supervisors have worked with and supported over allegations that are in effect political poison. Anyone who wasn't ready to throw the sheriff out of office could be accused of coddling a wife-beater.

Mirkarimi's friends and allies say the sheriff didn't want to plead guilty to anything. But the questionnaires that potential jurors had filled out showed that virtually everyone who might sit in judgment had read the sensational media coverage of the case, and Judge Garrett Wong had refused to move the trial elsewhere. The judge also rejected every significant motion Mirkarimi's attorney, Lidia Stiglich, made, and allowed into evidence material that the sheriff's team didn't think should be admissible. So the situation looked bleak, and Mirkarimi took a deal.

Mirkarimi maintains his innocence, and says he has no intention of stepping down. He agreed to plead guilty to a crime that had very little to do with what happened New Year's Eve, when the District Attorney's Office said he got into a physical altercation with his wife that left her with a bruise on her arm. False imprisonment was never one of the original charges; as is often the case in criminal cases, both sides accepted a less-serious charge in the name of getting the deal done.

Why Mayor Lee sees that as "a new set of legal issues" is baffling; the issues are exactly the same as they were before the plea bargain. None of this is to say that the original charges, backed up by well-publicized (although never fully examined in court) evidence, aren't serious. Domestic violence, as we've said repeatedly, is not a private matter, is not a minor crime, and has far too often been ignored by the courts, police, and prosecutors, sometimes with deadly consequences.

But the way this could play out will open Lee to charges of political opportunism. The mayor would need to charge Mirkarimi with "official misconduct," which is defined in the City Charter:

"Official misconduct means any wrongful behavior by a public officer in relation to the duties of his or her office, willful in its character, including any failure, refusal or neglect of an officer to perform any duty enjoined on him or her by law, or conduct that falls below the standard of decency, good faith and right action impliedly required of all public officers and including any violation of a specific conflict of interest or governmental ethics law."

Other than the "standard of decency" statute, which is pretty vague, there's not much in there for Lee to go on. Unless you say that because Mirkarimi pleaded guilty to a crime with "imprisonment" in the name he's somehow a threat to the inmates at the county jail, which is a huge stretch, it's hard to call this "official misconduct." (There is, on the other hand, the argument that Mirkarimi will be on probation, and thus part of the criminal justice system he oversees, and that it's an inherent conflict of interest. That, however, would mean any sheriff who was on probation for anything would be ineligible to serve, which again is a stretch.)

Comments

Just so I'm clear: Mirkarimi maintains his innocence even though he pled guilty, he is probably more guilty of "emotional abuse" even though evidence shows physical violence, and Mayor Lee shouldn't intervene because it would be "divisive." Unbelievable.

Posted by Ryan C on Mar. 15, 2012 @ 12:01 pm

He has said he is guilty, he has apologised, and he has even said that he did all that voluntarily.

Thats aid, it's probably all the stuff he hasn't admitted to, but that everyone increasingly knows is true, that is damning him now. He should have copped a plea off the bat. He knew what had done but was just hoping to get off on a technicality.

So he's shown poor judgment not only with the abuse, but with the way he has responded to it. Time to go.

Posted by Guest on Mar. 15, 2012 @ 12:34 pm

Do you want to take this deal?

Posted by Graco on Jul. 04, 2012 @ 9:22 am

Related articles

  • Full circle

    After months of discussion and faulty charges, the case against Ross Mirkarimi comes down to the initial act — and how broadly to define 'official misconduct'

  • Sorting through scandal

    Mirkarimi's case moves from the courts to City Hall -- raising tough political and logistical questions

  • The case for reinstating Mirkarimi

    Three points that the Mayor would do well to heed