Igniting a union

Leadership struggle among UC academic employees points to more militancy against budget proposals

|
(5)
Union reformer Mandy Cohen addresses an April 5 rally expressing solidarity with Wisconsin public employees.
PHOTO COURTESY OF AWDU

news@sfbg.com

The most contentious and pivotal election ever for the union of academic student employees at the University of California concluded May 8 in a landslide victory for reformers who will now have the chance to deliver on their promise of a more militant and democratic union. In many ways, it was a microcosm for the larger struggle over how to respond to proposals for deep cuts and tuition hikes in the public university systems.

Local 2865 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), represents 12,000 teaching assistants, tutors, readers, and researchers, making it the largest UAW union on the West Coast. Higher education workers make up 40,000 of the 390,000 active UAW members, just over 10 percent.

The caucus of reformers, organized under the banner Academic Workers for a Democratic Union (AWDU), won all 10 executive board positions and 45 out 80 seats at the Joint Council, taking control from incumbent leaders from United for Economic and Social Justice (USEJ), which has presided over the union for most of its 11-year history.

Voter turnout spiked tenfold over the last triennial election with 3,400 ballots cast this election cycle. Union organizers said the hike reflects intensive campaigning by both sides and a political atmosphere that is threatening both higher education in California and public employees across the country.

"This was the first real contested election our union ever had," said Mandy Cohen, a comparative literature graduate student at UC Berkeley and the AWDU recording secretary-elect. "There was a huge increase in participation, and it was very contentious. Our leadership never had to fight for their position."

The intensive campaigning translated into an unusually bitter battle for votes with ensuing accusations of foul play. The allegations include intimidation, personal attacks on the character of candidates, and ballot tampering. But the height of controversy and drama came once all the ballots were cast, when the USEJ-dominated elections committee suspended the vote count midway and AWDU members responded with an office sit-in of the union's headquarters.

Each side tells a different tale for these 1,500 disputed ballots from UC Berkeley and UCLA, the two largest campuses.

From USEJ's perspective, the sheer number of challenged ballots and the heated environment in the counting room overwhelmed elections officials, who decided to refer the matter to the Joint Council, the governing body of the local.

"AWDU had 20-plus people in the [vote-counting] room. They were continuing the intimidation and aggression. The elections committee decided that it was too much to handle," said Daraka Larimore-Hall, outgoing president of the local. He said that USEJ elections committee members have been so harangued since the incident that they are not granting requests for media interviews.

AWDU members, who consider UC Berkeley their stronghold, think the vote-counting freeze was the first step on the road to invalidating ballots from a campus with many AWDU supporters.

"Even though we knew they were really threatened by us, the very idea that we would try to disenfranchise 800 voters from the biggest campus — and that's how they would try to win the election — was really shocking," Cohen said.

She defended the AWDU decision to videotape the remaining ballots via webcam and take over union offices in protest. "We weren't taking a partisan position; we just said we wanted the votes counted. I felt like we were clearly in the right. We just wanted to defend the election — and that position was so strong."

Counting resumed when both sides finally settled on a third-party mediator, delivering 55 percent of the vote to AWDU.

Comments

Together the unions need to address the free spending of UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau which curbs raises. (The author who has 35 years’ consulting experience, has taught at UC Berkeley (Cal.) where he was able to observe the culture & the way senior management work)

University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau gross over spending, inept decisions: recruits (using California tax $) out of state $50,000 tuition students that displace qualified Californians from public university education; spends $7,000,000 for consultants to do his & many vice chancellors jobs (prominent East Coast university accomplishing same at 0 cost); pays ex Michigan governor $300,000 for lectures; Latino enrollment drops while out of state jumps 2010; tuition to Return on Investment (ROI) drops below top10; NCAA places basketball program on probation: absence institutional control.

Californians, UC Board of Regents Chairman Gould, Calif. State Legislature should take note of UC chancellors, like Birgeneau, who ignore California’s deficit and replace them with those who understand the basic concept of public service to Californians.

Posted by Guest on May. 18, 2011 @ 1:59 pm

Decent article. The only substantive detail it skirts over is the fact that mediation broke down. The details of the failure of that process might be interesting.

Posted by Guest on May. 19, 2011 @ 2:14 am

If you'd explain that would add to the discussion

Posted by Guest on May. 19, 2011 @ 9:18 am

From my understanding disclosing the circumstances which caused the breakdown in mediation would actually violate terms of the mediation agreement meant to ensure the mediator's privacy. I was never privy to the specifics of that agreement so I don't know exactly what the reasoning is on that (it may have something to do with then using the mediator and their participation for political point scoring). In any case, on my understanding we don't get to know why mediation broke down. Or, rather, those of us who do know something would be acting improperly if they were to reveal the circumstances which caused mediation to fail.

Posted by Guest on May. 20, 2011 @ 3:21 am

As Californians face foreclosure, unemployment & depressed wages it's time the timid Governor, UC Board of Regents, whining President Yudof showed leadership by curbing costs, particularly wages, benefits. As a Californian, I don't care what others earn at private, public universities. If wages are better elsewhere, chancellors, vice chancellors, tenured, non tenured faculty, UCOP executives should apply for the positions. If wages keep employees committed to UC, leave for the better paying job. The sky above UC will not fall. California suffers from the worst deficit in modern times. UC wages, benefits must reflect California's ability to pay, not what others are paid elsewhere. Campus chancellors, vice chancellors, tenured & non-tenured faculty, UCOP executives are replaceable by more talented individuals.
Curb UC tuition increases:
No furloughs
18 percent reduction in UCOP salaries & $50 million cut.
18 percent prune of campus chancellors', vice chancellors' salaries.
15 percent trim of tenured faculty salaries, increased teaching load
10 percent decrease in non-tenured faculty salaries, as well as increase research, teaching load
100% elimination of all Academic Senate, Academic Council costs, wages.

A rose bush blooms after pruning.

The Governor, UC Board of Regents, whining President can bridge the trust gap to the public by offering reassurances that salaries reflect depressed wages in California. The sky above UC has not, will not fall.
Californians are reasonable people. Levy no new taxes until an approved balanced budget: let the Governor/Legislature lead: make the tough-minded (not cold hearted) decisions of elected leadership. Afterwards come to the public for specified, continuing or new taxes.
Thanking you in advance for your partnership & for standing up for Californians, University of California system.

Posted by Guest on May. 20, 2011 @ 2:38 pm

Also from this author

  • Sharing the sun

    Solar energy entrepreneurs are pioneering new models for democratizing power

  • Not in our neighborhood

    District 2 residents and supervisor oppose housing projects for at-risk young people

  • Power to the powerful

    PG&E's proposed rate increase would hurt conservation and the poor