The breaking news about 23-year-old Prince Harry secretly being deployed in Afghanistan as a battlefield air controller created a public sensation in Britain. It also resulted in the quick return home of the prince - third in line to the British throne - for security reasons.
The episode pointed to the British tradition of expecting the sons of British kings and queens to enter military service when their country is at war.
The same was true in the United States during World War II, when four of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's sons entered the armed forces, as did General Dwight Eisenhower's son, John Eisenhower.
Since the expansion of the number of women in the military, what about George W. Bush's daughters - Barbara and Jenna? Their father repeatedly describes the war in Iraq as crucially important to protect the United States and to spread democracy in the Middle East.
President Bush also repeatedly asserted that the losses of life and the costs of the Iraq war are "worth the sacrifice." Whose sacrifice?
Certainly not that of the family in the White House. There have been no indications in this town of 24/7 gossip of either the parents urging or the daughters considering joining the armed forces.
Recently, a Midwestern mother, who lost her son in Iraq, declared, half weeping, "Why am I planning for a funeral when George W. Bush is planning for a wedding?"
Is this mother being unfair? Or is she reflecting a feeling that there is a double standard operating here?
There is a certain moral authority to governing -- setting an example, sharing in the sacrifice initiated by the White House -- that escapes both George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Both were early draft dodgers who were gung-ho for the Vietnam war so long as someone else in their age group was doing the fighting. They both have children who have declined to serve during the Iraq war-occupation.
It would be a different question if the Bush and Cheney offspring had come out publicly against the war or were conscientious objectors. No signs of these positions thus far.
There is a simple safeguard regarding the decision to make war while leaving the younger adult sons and daughters of Congress and the White House enjoying civilian life as the casualties and illnesses of the "other Americans" keep mounting. Ask your member of Congress to introduce a one page bill that says the following: Whenever Congress and the White House take our country to war, all able-bodied military-age children of every member of Congress, the President and the Vice-President will be conscripted automatically into the armed forces.
When politicians' children are required to go off to war, it tends to concentrate their minds toward waging peace.
Most Commented On
- The Car Lobby - December 4, 2013
- The fantasy world - December 4, 2013
- Can you quit when you have already been fired? - December 4, 2013
- Cars Kill 100 Times As Many Pedestrians As Bicycles - December 4, 2013
- Not to mention free pensions and healthcare. - December 4, 2013
- Since I do not support conscription, it follows that my view is - December 4, 2013
- What other groups of people do you hate that much based on a - December 4, 2013
- Affordability issues were not mentioned in the article at all? - December 4, 2013
- The answer, dear friends, is to spend more money - December 4, 2013
- So your talk about - December 4, 2013